Home > Free and open source software, Marketing > Marketing Jaguar. Marketing open source.

Marketing Jaguar. Marketing open source.

November 18th, 2004

Earlier this week, I attended a talk by Jaguar‘s Head of Global Marketing Communications, Laurence Thomas. In it, he described how the company had worked to move the Jaguar brand from being seen as the old man’s favourite, to a credible, premium alternative to BMW, Mercedes, etc.

As Laurence described the substantial efforts his team had employed to effect the change, I began to think about two things we’d discussed during season 2, episode 3 of LugRadio:

  • the role of marketing in open source software
  • the NHS’s decision to stick with Microsoft.

Aq was very vocal in his opposition to any form of, what he might describe as, corporatism, including marketing, in open source software. Later, when discussing the NHS, Jono said that we had failed – “we” being the open source community.

Aq wants us to find a way, other than marketing, to build and promote open source software. Jono feels the collective pain of a community whose products, and organisation, are experiencing the shortcomings of not employing marketing.

Beautiful, fast software

During his talk about repositioning Jaguar, Laurence Thomas made it clear that changing the perception of a brand does not begin and end with some witty copy in an advert. Instead, the company needs a common goal and philosophy, which then creates the brand

Internally, Jaguar has a statement of purpose, which is intended to inform everything the company does:

Beautiful, fast cars.

Three words which are broad enough not to restrict but specific enough to be a meaningful guide for the company’s actions.

Rather than simply telling the world that Jaguar is different, they have actually changed the company, so that their products, service and communications all live up to a certain set of standards and ideals. The reality informs the brand.

This, my marketing-fearing open source friends, is what marketing is. It’s a management philosophy that evaluates needs and creates solutions to satisfy those needs. To use open source terminology – it’s about scratching itches.

Perhaps it’s useful to see how the marketers themselves describe marketing:

Marketing is the management process responsible for identifying, anticipating and satisfying customer requirements profitably. Chartered Institute of Marketing definition.

In other words, marketing is not just advertising, nor is it dodgy door-to-door selling. Marketing is finding out what people need and giving it to them. The profit you make would normally be financial, but it could be any benefit that is worth more than the effort expended.

It’s reasonable to say that the open source development model already employs marketing methods. The challenge is to get open source proponents and project leaders to realise that marketing isn’t evil; it’s essential.

As Jaguar have shown, marketing isn’t about smoke and mirrors, or trying to fool people. Marketing is about creating a reality which is best for both the organisation and the end user.

I’ll be writing more on this subject, over the next few weeks. I’m sure I’ll raise the ire of some people, but there’s genuinely no need to fear marketing within open source; in fact, to dismiss it is to dismiss much of what already happens.

  1. Anonymous
    November 22nd, 2004 at 09:20 | #1

    To my mind marketing/branding is about creating a perception of a company that isn’t based on products. The ultimate aim of Jaguar is to build their brand to such an extent that you aren’t buying a car, you’re making a lifestyle choice, buying an image, you’re making in statement.

    In my opinion open source needs to be based on software and the benefits of software alone, not the smoke and mirrors of a branding exercise. What worries me is that IBM might have different ideas and that could create a split.

    fizz

  2. November 22nd, 2004 at 09:36 | #2

    With respect, Fizz, that’s the problem. Your perception of marketing is one thing and the reality of marketing is another. Until people within open source projects stop fearing something they don’t understand, they won’t be able to benefit from what marketing can offer.

    Some bad things are done in the name of marketing, which is unfortunate. Some naff people seem to be attracted to the periphery of marketing. Neither of those things makes marketing, as a discipline, invalid.

    I think we need to start looking at what marketing actually is, and forget our own perceptions, if they’re wrong. I wouldn’t dream of telling a Chartered Surveyer that he was wrong in the definition of his own profession. Similarly, I think we should stop trying to impose our mistaken ideas of what marketing is, onto the discipline and its practioners.

    Everything I’ve said is backed up by the fact that you say, “open source needs to be based on software and the benefits of software alone”. Marketing is about benefits, nothing else. As you allude to, people are interest in benefits. However, branding and other aspects of marketing come in when you want to communicate those benefits to people.

    Open source has an opportunity to become the dominant method of software creation. Thanks to the benefits of the open source system, people are really willing to give it a chance. It’s almost as tho’ someone’s thrown a grenade into a lake and loads of fish have come to the surface, ready for the taking. We just need to do that taking, and that’s where marketing comes in.

    I’m not sure of the situation with IBM but if smaller open source operators don’t embrace marketing, then large players certainly will, and they’ll benefit greatly from it.

    As for making Jaguar into a lifestyle choice, what’s wrong with that? You can’t tell me that your preference for open source/free software isn’t part of a wider lifestyle choice.

  3. November 22nd, 2004 at 09:39 | #3

    Further to my previous comment, the whole point of my mentioning Jaguar was to show that their branding starts with the products. If the products didn’t reflect the brand by offering premium quality, the latest technology, high levels of refinement and luxury, there would be no brand.

    The product is where the brand starts. The brand comes out of the product.

  4. Anonymous
    January 10th, 2005 at 19:31 | #4

    This post has been removed by a blog administrator.

  5. Anonymous
    January 10th, 2005 at 21:19 | #5

    This post has been removed by a blog administrator.

  6. Anonymous
    January 14th, 2005 at 13:05 | #6

    This post has been removed by a blog administrator.

  7. Anonymous
    February 9th, 2005 at 14:49 | #7

    This post has been removed by a blog administrator.

  8. Anonymous
    February 21st, 2005 at 10:17 | #8

    This post has been removed by a blog administrator.

Comments are closed.